{"id":95,"date":"2024-03-07T21:28:57","date_gmt":"2024-03-07T21:28:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.napier.ac.uk\/enu-mindcrea\/?p=95"},"modified":"2024-03-07T21:28:58","modified_gmt":"2024-03-07T21:28:58","slug":"cedar-february-2024-meeting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.napier.ac.uk\/enu-mindcrea\/2024\/03\/07\/cedar-february-2024-meeting\/","title":{"rendered":"CEDAR February 2024 Meeting"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Wednesday the 27th<\/sup> of February, 2024, the first CEDAR meeting of the year took place in E17, on the Edinburgh Napier University Merchiston campus and simultaneously on Teams.<\/em><\/p>\n

Two presentations were delivered by the following CEDAR members:<\/p>\n

1 – Franziska Heck PhD candidate<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cHuman-Robot Interaction: Social robots as companions for students to improve well-being, to prevent\/reduce loneliness.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Franziska Heck has recently started her PhD in the field of Human-Robot Interaction at Napier.<\/p>\n

\"\"She wants to investigate whether social robots can be used as companions for students to improve their well-being and combat loneliness. She is investigating whether they can support students more effectively with interventions than digital aids such as apps or chatbots.<\/p>\n

Finally, the work will provide inspiration and recommendations for improvement for the industry, for future robots and applications.<\/p>\n

Her presentation led to interesting interactions with the audience on:<\/p>\n

Loneliness: To what extent can social robots prevent or reduce social interactions with other people?<\/p>\n

Methods:
\n– Mediation\/moderation
\n– Experiences with recruitment and timing of experiments
\n– Intervention in the experiment: Are positive psychology exercises appropriate?<\/p>\n

AI: What are the risks of AI in human-robot interaction?<\/p>\n

2 – Lucy Downey and Prof Achille Fonzone<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cAutomated buses – What about their passengers?\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\" Professor Achille Fonzone and Dr Lucy Downey, from the Transport Research Institute at Edinburgh Napier, presented the CAVForth Autonomous Bus Project.<\/p>\n

The primary objective of the project is to deliver an autonomous (self-driving) scheduled passenger service with Stagecoach East Scotland, carrying up to 10,000 passengers per week along a 28-mile route between Edinburgh and Fife, across the Forth Road Bridge.<\/p>\n

The Napier team is one of six partners on the project and is responsible for monitoring societal acceptance of autonomous vehicles on Scotland’s roads.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

A mixed-method approach is used with online surveys and focus groups, structured interviews and stakeholder consultations.<\/p>\n

Stakeholder consultation show:<\/u><\/p>\n

The stakeholders see benefits in the social (road safety) and economic (financial savings and network performance) aspects; and risks in the social aspects (road safety) and technology (AB performance and reliability).<\/p>\n

The pre-trial passengers’ replies show:<\/u><\/p>\n

Less than a quarter considered themselves well informed about autonomous buses.<\/p>\n

49.3% would use autonomous buses at the time of their introduction or shortly afterwards. 27.2% would wait a while. 16.2% would be use them only if it was absolutely necessary and 7.2% would refuse to use them.<\/p>\n

The most eager to use autonomous buses are young males, those living in rural areas, those who have experience with advanced driver automated systems in their cars, and those who thought the AV bus ride would be more comfortable compared to a traditional bus.<\/p>\n

\"\"Over three-quarters (76.5%) of survey participants expressed a willingness to ride when a member of staff is on board to monitor vehicle operations and provide customer care. Very few, less than a fifth, would agree to ride in a bus without an employee on board.<\/p>\n

The bus passengers’ replies show:<\/u><\/p>\n

The majority of passengers agreed the bus was driven well (95%) in a safe manner (95%) and the ride was smooth (86%).<\/p>\n

Focus Groups with passengers showed:<\/p>\n